There's a british webpage that has a test on it. It's called the "Political Compass" test. The first time I took it I was surprised. I was just a little bit to the right of center. I thought I was far more conservative. There is another scale on this test, another dimension with "authoritarian" on one side and "libertarian" on the other. I was dead center on this scale.
I went back and took the test again just now. I was in exactly the same spot on the left/right scale, but I had climbed a little toward authoritarian. I think I was trying to get more conservative and libertarian, so I was answering a bit more extreme. All I managed to do was drive the test toward authoritarian, though thankfully not much.
It's a two dimensional chart with an x and a y component. The horizontal x scale is the typical left/right we are used to in politics. Seeing the y scale is what drew me to this new way of looking at political thinking. The y scale is the authoritarian/libertarian component. Sargon of Akaad, aka Carl Benjamin, first brought this test to my attention, and I mentioned it in a post over a year ago. This is the first time I've taken the test myself, though.
I have a few issues with the way some questions are worded. For example, the question on abortion is a simple yes/no with the only exception being when the life of the mother is at stake. To that I would add cases of rape and incest. I think those ought to be entered into a police report as well. Rape is far too underreported now, and this might be one step in reporting more actual rapes. What we have now is a lot of women using abortion as a form of birth control, which is why we have over a million abortions each year.
I answered the abortion question "agree," even though I have a problem with the way it's worded. It could have been broken into two or three questions, so the degree of agreement can be accuratly be derived.
I think the debate has shifted from a left vs right to an authoritarian vs libertarian perspective. This is a very dangerous thing in a culture to do. I'm not saying it's bad for a debate to occur, just that the debate is so uncivil. And it's mostly one side of the debate that's uncivil. It's childish for someone to continually shout down their opposition, but that's what we hear from the authoritarian side. The reason for this is simple. It's the only way authoritarians can win their arguments.
Also, and I believe I've said this before, the authoritarian side includes Nazis, Fascists, Communists, Socialists, the KKK, Antifa, Social Justice Warriors and anyone else who is likely to use force to get what they want.